This investigation models Medsky's expected operating needs against Central Bank foreign-currency figures and identifies an apparent gap. The model should be rebuilt with aircraft-specific burn rates, routes, wet-lease terms, maintenance, handling, and the actual execution status of credits.
1,800 flights — flight volume used by the author for January–July 2025
Flights, fuel and $14.4 million
The model compared $14,430,727 in accepted foreign-exchange requests with roughly 1,800 reported Medsky flight movements between January and July 2025. It estimated external operating costs at $8.6–$10.8 million and therefore produced a residual of about $3.6–$5.8 million. That is a model output, not an audited loss or proof of diversion.
The assumed external cost was $4,800–$6,000 per flight for insurance, navigation, foreign-airport charges, leases or overseas maintenance, crew costs and passenger fees, while excluding locally paid items. The residual is roughly 25%–40% of $14.43 million—not the 33%–55% range stated originally. It also depends on whether 1,800 means flight legs or round trips and whether all lease and maintenance obligations were captured.
What 1,800 flights imply—and what they do not
Aviation has high dollar intensity and uneven access to aircraft, routes and maintenance. Comparing airlines only by flights or fleet count can miss wet leases, charter operations and different business models. The valid question is whether allocations are proportionate to verified activity and competitive conditions.
Four explanations for the modelled surplus
Public schedules and tracking services may miss cancellations, positioning flights and charter work. Accepted requests may not equal executed payments. No difference should be labelled missing money until company accounts, contracts and bank execution data are reconciled.
Records that could verify the aviation economics
Sector oversight should link foreign-exchange access to audited fleet activity, passenger kilometres, lease obligations, maintenance and safety compliance. Competition review should examine whether comparable airlines face comparable documentation and processing times.
Publish airline FX by purpose—fuel, lease, maintenance, insurance, handling and other services—together with execution status and verified operational metrics. The airline should have an opportunity to correct the assumptions and provide omitted cost categories.
The published route count leaves 388 movements unexplained
The route subtotals cited were about 1,050 Tunis movements, 160 Istanbul, 54 Malta, 108 Rome, 32 Milan and eight Medina Umrah flights. They sum to 1,412, not 1,800. The remaining 388 must be identified, or the denominator revised, before an average external cost per flight can support the residual.
The cost model should be rebuilt flight by flight with tail number, aircraft type, block time, airport and navigation invoices, passenger charges, lease structure and maintenance reserves. A company response could close omitted categories. Until then the analysis identifies a reconciliation gap in public data—not money proven to be missing.
Editorial method: This investigation rebuilds the original calculation from the linked public records, preserves the source period and transaction stage, and separates documented figures from estimates, interpretation and allegations.
Mohamed Algarj
Mohamed Algarj