This investigation traces Nouri al-Abbar and Mohamed al-Darrat across decision-support roles as governments and presidential arrangements changed, and aggregates LYD 81.6 million in spending over seven years. It asks what publicly accessible policies, studies, or decisions resulted from that institutional continuity.

LYD 81.6m

LYD 81.6m — seven-year spending estimate presented by the author

The analysis

This investigation traces Nouri al-Abbar and Mohamed al-Darrat across decision-support roles as governments and presidential arrangements changed, and aggregates LYD 81.6 million in spending over seven years. It asks what publicly accessible policies, studies, or decisions resulted from that institutional continuity.

What the public record establishes

The linked records provide the institutional and numerical frame for this investigation. They support a documented reading, but do not automatically prove every causal claim or allegation. Rebuild the LYD 81.6 million total year by year and identify which legal entity, chapter, and expenditure type each amount belongs to. Continuity in office is not proof of misconduct; the relevant test is lawful appointment, conflicts, procurement, and measurable output. The assertion that no policy was published is difficult to prove exhaustively; state the search methodology and invite the institutions to supply missing publications.

What remains unanswered

The public-interest test is what the responsible institutions publish next: the underlying decision, transaction-level data, implementation record and a response that can be checked against the evidence in this governance file.

Editorial method: This investigation rebuilds the original calculation from the linked public records, preserves the source period and transaction stage, and separates documented figures from estimates, interpretation and allegations.

Mohamed Algarj